Analysis: The Next Legal Threat For Game Makers Hitskin_logo Hitskin.com

This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skinReturn to the skin page

Aetherius Network

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Aetherius Network

International multi-gaming guild since 2006.

Come chat with us on Discord! It's where everyone is at now! https://discord.gg/aBSngGf
Check out our Aetherius Network Facebook Page to see upcoming news and/or enter giveaways.
Follow us on Twitter!

    Analysis: The Next Legal Threat For Game Makers

    Shu
    Shu
    Celestial Council
    Celestial Council


    Male
    Number of posts : 10794
    Location : Singapore
    IGN[Game NickName] : Ashura/Iori Yagami
    Current Status : Busy at Work
    Registration date : 2008-03-31

    Analysis: The Next Legal Threat For Game Makers Empty Analysis: The Next Legal Threat For Game Makers

    Post by Shu Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:45 am

    Analysis: The Next Legal Threat For Game Makers Privacy2



    The video game industry has barely had time for the
    hangovers after this year's Supreme Court victory celebration to wear
    off, but its next big legal challenge is already gaining strength.

    While June's high court ruling let developers rest easy about the
    content they put in games, many attorneys at the time warned that
    privacy issues, specifically as they relate to children, could be the
    next thing to watch for. Late last week, the Federal Trade Commission
    announced proposed changes to the Children's Online Privacy Protection
    Act (COPPA) that could have a notable impact on many game makers.

    The Commission wants to make several amendments to the decade-old privacy rules that are meant to protect kids under 13.

    Among the changes is the expansion of the definition of "personal
    information" to include a child’s location, along with any personal data
    collected via tracking cookies that are used for behavioral
    advertising. Facial recognition technology would be included as well.

    Websites and apps that collect this information would need to prove they
    are able to protect it, hold onto it "for only as long as is reasonably
    necessary," and then safely delete it.

    The agency says the updates are "intended to ensure that key information
    will be presented to parents in a succinct 'just-in-time' notice, and
    not just in a privacy policy."

    The review of the law was fast-tracked last April, owing to what the FTC
    calls "the rapid-fire pace of technological change," the number of
    children using cell phones, the rise of social network sites and
    increases in interactive gaming. The FTC noted that many children today
    are "tech-savvy, but judgment-poor."

    The goal, according to the FTC, is to find a balance between keeping
    kids safe and not overly burdening companies in this era of rapid
    technological changes.

    The largest immediate impact, assuming these changes are passed, would
    be on mobile and social game developers, who have already had run-ins
    with the Feds.

    In May, Disney-owned Playdom paid $3 million to settle charges it had
    violated COPPA. The company was accused of illegally collecting and
    disclosing personal information from hundreds of thousands of children
    under age 13 without their parents' prior consent.

    And just last month, developer Broken Thumbs Apps settled a similar case with the FTC over the child-targeted app Emily's Dress Up and Shop for a reported $50,000.

    As traditional publishers expand their footprint into these areas, these changes will have an even wider impact.

    It's risky legal territory, but the good news is it's a much less
    controversial issue. Few developers are likely to argue that parental
    notification and consent – and the importance of keeping children's
    personal information secure – is an intrusion on their rights, even if
    it might cost them a little money.

    "It's less about the content in the online environment as it is in fair
    warning and fees," adds Michael Zolandz, partner at SNR Denton. "I think
    that's the big issue in the commission's context. It's not so much what
    children are able to access. It's hidden fees or circumstances where
    it's a free download that then smacks you with hundreds of dollars in
    add-ons."

    It's not the sort of thing that will keep a game off of shelves – or,
    more precisely, off of Facebook and the App Store. It is the sort of
    thing that can ding the bottom line noticeably if not followed
    precisely, though – not to mention the negative stigma that comes with
    violating child protection rules.

    And given how nervous investors in the video game space can be, that's
    something the executive suites of companies are going to be very wary
    of.

      Current date/time is Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:29 am