Gamelab 2011: MUD Creator Bartle: 'Current Social Games Are Not Fun' Hitskin_logo Hitskin.com

This is a Hitskin.com skin preview
Install the skinReturn to the skin page

Aetherius Network

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Aetherius Network

International multi-gaming guild since 2006.

Come chat with us on Discord! It's where everyone is at now! https://discord.gg/aBSngGf
Check out our Aetherius Network Facebook Page to see upcoming news and/or enter giveaways.
Follow us on Twitter!

    Gamelab 2011: MUD Creator Bartle: 'Current Social Games Are Not Fun'

    Shu
    Shu
    Celestial Council
    Celestial Council


    Male
    Number of posts : 10794
    Location : Singapore
    IGN[Game NickName] : Ashura/Iori Yagami
    Current Status : Busy at Work
    Registration date : 2008-03-31

    Gamelab 2011: MUD Creator Bartle: 'Current Social Games Are Not Fun' Empty Gamelab 2011: MUD Creator Bartle: 'Current Social Games Are Not Fun'

    Post by Shu Thu Jun 30, 2011 5:49 pm

    Gamelab 2011: MUD Creator Bartle: 'Current Social Games Are Not Fun' Bartle



    "Today, 20 million people will play CityVille,"
    said Richard Bartle, co-creator of the MUD, and father of the MMO at a
    Gamasutra-attended Gamelab 2011 talk in Barcelona. "And 100 million will
    play it this month. My question is, what will these people be playing
    five years from now?"

    "The big thing about social games that they don't like to tell you, is
    they're not actually social," he says. "Games played on social network
    sites is what we mean by social games ... These games are categorized
    more by the platform than that they are social themselves."

    Most games on Facebook, "despite being called social, are basically solo
    games, with a veneer, just a simple layer on top where you ask your
    friends to do something for you in the game," says Bartle. "You're not
    going to make new friends, you're not going to form alliances, or do
    anything like that playing FarmVille."

    The social aspect of it gives validity, he says, to let you know other
    people are playing it, so "it proves you're not absolutely mad." Most
    games get their players now from having advertised to players of
    previous games.

    "The way they engage their players is not through interesting gameplay,
    it's done through extrinsic rewards - basically bribes." These are
    badges, pats on the back, and so forth. As he explains; "I'm level two!
    That person over there, who started playing five minutes ago, is level
    one! I'm better!"

    Sometimes these games do have things mixed in which are actually fun to
    play. "The difference is, social games rely on the extrinsic rewards so
    as to be compelling," he says. "People keep playing the game because it
    keeps giving them things - rewards." This has led to gamification.

    "In the hands of designers, this has a great deal of potential, but
    unfortunately it's not in the hands of designers, it's in the hands of
    marketers. I mention this because my player types have been used in gamification in spite of my never having touched it."

    "Most game designers are not a fan of social games, and indeed, I as a
    game designer am not a fan. Surely, if you play a game, you must be able
    to lose somehow." Bartle says the backlash against social games comes
    "because they lack gameplay, which leaves this impression that people
    like games, but these aren't really like games. And they're called
    social but they're not actually social, so why do people play these
    games? Because of the rewards."

    Human beings are actually pretty smart, Bartle asserts, saying we're
    good at data processing and pattern matching. "People who play games
    will notice patterns in those games. The problem with social games is
    people will recognize those more."

    By way of example, he pointed to children. "When you're a small child
    and you're given a star, you think it's pretty good." But then when you
    start realizing you get stars for things that aren't that good, your
    friends no longer value it, and then you subsequently don't value it,
    and then you start to actually not want stars. "The bad aspect is when
    people realize, 'this game is boring,'" he says. "You do one task, you
    finish it, and you're given another task. You're just making more work
    for yourself."

    "What will people be playing in five years? Not CityVille," he said. "They'll be playing something else. Not only will they not be playing CityVille, they won't be playing a game that's like CityVille, because they'll recognize why they stopped playing it."

    So what will they be playing? People understand if something's fun to
    play versus just rewarding them. Unless it's actually fun to collect the
    things you're collecting in games, even in MMOs, they'll be worthless
    as soon as expansions come out, and you have to do it all over again. It
    becomes work.

    People will want something "better," which means different things to
    different people, he said. "Today's players of social games will not
    want to play more social games," Bartle asserts. "There's no gameplay to
    them, they rely on extrinsic rewards. So what we have to give them is
    more games."

    "The reason I like [social games] is that I see it as a way to make
    non-gamers become game-literate," he says. "There will have to be a way
    to migrate from extrinsic rewards to intrinsic rewards, because that's
    what makes games fun. ... Social games are beginning the education of
    people who started with small games, and are turning into people who
    actually want real games. Games that have gameplay."

      Current date/time is Fri Nov 22, 2024 7:38 am